One, more approving, from Ben Goldsmith in ‘Convergence Review heralds a dramatic shift in Australian media‘:

In line with the review’s consistent emphasis on “regulatory parity”, the report proposes that all “Content Service Enterprises” be required to commit a percentage of total production expenditure to specified Australian content, along the lines of that currently operating for select subscription television channels.

The category of Content Service Enterprises is a broad and as yet ill-defined class of entities providing programs and other content to Australian audiences on any delivery platform.

It appears likely to cover large and small Australian players such as the existing free to air and subscription television companies, Bigpond and FetchTV, as well as international services that supply content to Australians including, presumably, Facebook, YouTube, and BBC iPlayer.

Some commentators are already suggesting that the imposition of this requirement on international services will discourage them from operating in Australia and potentially lead some Australian services to relocate offshore. And there are many questions about how these enterprises will be identified and monitored. But in theory at least, this is a bold attempt to spread the responsibility for supporting Australian content production to all services operating here.

Martin Hirst in Media Convergence review is light on detail – and on regulation is less impressed:

I think it’s quite empty of content, to be perfectly honest. The headline in it for me is that it’s an attempt to come to terms with what I call the “techno-legal time gap” – the dissonance between what technology can do and how it is regulated….

The devil is really in the detail, and it’s difficult to tell just from this interim report where exactly the entire review will head.

One of the most crucial issues seems to be the time frame. We are now probably 18 months out from the next federal election, and it’s going to take much longer to get that sorted out. So it looks like the review has created a political football to be kicked around until the election comes.

 

TV near CCF1

TV near CCF1 by Jacob Whittaker (www.jacobwhittaker.co.uk)

Managing Director of the ABC Mark Scott, writes interestingly in Content and competition in a changing media world about the future of TV, how its not dead, but evolving. They seem to be putting a lot of faith in iView – I can’t comment there, I tried it some years ago and my bandwidth just wasn’t up to it. I should try again.

An issue I had not thought about from the producer’s POV is the issue of competitors:

To date, audiences are still more lucrative in front of linear television, with the volume of advertising that can be sold in that forum.

And if there is to be catch-up content, the idea of putting it alongside a competitor’s content on the same service can seem like it’s a bridge too far.

There are rights issues, management issues, technological and revenue issues. And let’s face it, it can be difficult to get competitors to work together.

I hope we can.

Despite all the technical innovations, and the ways that younger people are accessing content, Scott concludes:

We know our future will not depend on our platforms. They’ll be robust for a while yet. Our future will depend on delivering compelling content and program offerings: distinctive, high quality, Australian content of wide appeal and of specialist interest. And our future will also depend on us relentlessly making that programming available to audiences to consume how and when they like.

I think he’s kind-of saying what I believe – content and platforms go together. If you’re not making that marriage in heaven, then the union will probably not get consummated. IE no one will engage with your stuff.

Will have to watch this space for the Convergence Review Report.

 


Ex-student Esther Werdiger is doing some lovely graphic art, posting it via Instagram.

If you’re in to iPhone photography, here’s some lovely beach pics.

Unseen shadows, a huge independent publishing initiative from Barry Nugent, and a good example of what an independent can achieve in the networked, transmedia environment. Great use of social media to publicise it, freebies to get you hooked, then stuff to buy.

The art of Laurie Lipton, apparently all pencil. [I like to think she doesn't have to actually erase much?]

And now for something slightly different.

It’s not graphic art, but sculpture: Dream – Spontaneous combustion (2008) by sculptor Olaf Brzeski.

 


Scott Walker gives plenty of tips if you want to create some transmedia story-telling. The core idea seems to be stick to your strengths, then hopefully you’ll get collaborators spawning their own ideas and artwork from what you have done.

Mike Monello was involved with Blair Witch and is now CEO of marketing agency Campfire. He argues:

…we like to tell stories across multiple platforms and we like to tell them through experience rather than pure content. …we do make content but our general philosophy is don’t necessarily be the storyteller don’t think of yourself as a storyteller but think of yourself as building a world and experiences that get people your story to tell.

He argues in favour of convergence. TV remains the main contemporary storytelling medium, but people want more and more interaction with those stories. Transmedia, to Monello, is:

…a storytelling word … stories that are not bound by any single media format. It’s what happens between a TV show and an online experiment, or between a book and a game.

That what makes it different than franchising where you take a character like Batman and put him in a video game and then put him in a movie and then we have a cartoon on the air and then we have comic books…

The difference is that when you think about transmedia storytelling, you’re thinking about the meaning that’s created between those forms of media and how each of those story builds a larger story.

I think the word transmedia is really an adjective, so you can have transmedia storytelling and you can have Transmedia marketing but I don’t think you can point to something and say “that’s transmedia”.

[my bold]

So its difficult to pull off, you have to reconceive story-telling:

Transmedia requires you to think about a story maybe the way an architecting thinks about a building… A transmedia story is kind of empty and meaningless until it’s occupied by people, and so you have to kind of design around behaviors, you have to design around more basic kind of desires.

The good news is that he thinks its a field ripe for the independents, so get into it, everyone!

Robert Pratten is discussing pacing in transmedia storytelling. As he says:

In an interactive, portmanteau-type transmedia story, the author tries to give the audience a good degree of freedom to explore and investigate at their own volition while still aiming to create a satisfying dramatic storyline. Broadly speaking, making these open world, non-linear stories thrilling can be tricky. A central problem of these experiences, assuming that a linear version of the story would be worth reading, is pacing.

He argues that pacing in transmedia lies in the four dimensions of story, ability to move forward, required reaction speed, and platform. they’re all inter-related and must be considered together. Some interesting diagrams well worth reflection.

And now for the NBT….

Intermedia, according to Simon Staffans. According to my definition of transmedia, I already think is must include a social media element, but this is what Staffans is getting at. Intermedia is “the flow of action and interaction that happens as a result of cross media or transmedia methods”. OK, terminology schmerminology. But my importantly, Staffans implores us:

This immediate, spontaneous, it’s-happening-now-and-gosh-I’m-in-on-it! experience is an area that is currently woefully underdeveloped.

So get on thy bici, ninito and ninitas!

Some new transmedia releases

I loved the previous Batman game. This one seems more of the same.

Not sure. Does it stray too much from the published story world? I’m not convinced that Tolkein can be built on the way that Batman can be, its such a different publishing tradition.

Transmedia for kids from Scholastic and Ruckus (no titles yet).

The Karada, ‘a transmedia horror story about a collapsing metaverse’, from Heroes author Tim Kring. Never got into Heroes, but I know lotsa folk did.

 

As Kathryn found out at the ABC careers day.

anyway, now i understand the why we did the subject and its relevance to our careers and future and i realise that second life is not what it is all about, it is the radically digital process we used and the possibilities of being so digital. and i’m not just saying this and copying jenny’s blog, i actually believe it or not, genuinely believe it myself. it clicked in about week 11 i think and then even more so after the ABC careers day i went to where this sort of stuff is what the industry is all about these days.
so in all, thank you IM2 for making me more open-minded in my media thinking and i can definitely see how this new knowledge will be somewhat useful in years to come. well actually, maybe that will only be days seeing as everything changes so quickly now!

Yes, it’s confronting. Some people can’t rise to the challenge. But it’s a beautiful thing when a student gets it! Thanks Kathryn.

© 2012 geniwate.com Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Hit Counter provided by Seo Packages