Feb 262012
 
 


These principles are meant to be the big picture ones that translate in different ways into specific works, or series of works.

1. nothing is finished
Because a finished story is a dead story, ie one that nobody ever reads. This is particularly so for transmedia, which lives at least partly online. Works evolve, partly because of fan conversations. Authors have to encourage the unfinished nature of work. Being unfinished is being alive.

2. nothing is owned
Oh, there may be ways in which copyright can create certainly income streams for pivotal authors. But to attempt to own transmedia works is to circumvent their life span.

3. no part of the work is pivotal
If you have a must-see ep, you’re not thinking transmedia. Like the web itself, transmedia works have nodes, and each particular node can be by-passed, so long as enough of the others are engaged with. Plots are refracted through various iterations, and whichever part of the story you get, that’s your story.

4. the puzzle is all-important
It’s the puzzle, stupid. Not the plot. Sure there are plots, but plots come and go, depending on which nodes you’ve interacted with. It’s the puzzle of tying the bits of plot together in a way that you’re happy with that is all-important. Some of that tying-together might be done by you, in social media or fan fiction.

5. Splatter media
Bits of work published to different platforms, each node with enough of interest to reward the vigilant by their attention.

6. Intelligent media
Transmedia is not for idiots – those peeps have the box. Don’t talk down to your audience. [On the other hand, providing well-flagged summaries and spoilers for those who can't put in the hard yards is not a bad thing - just don't be surprised if you get told you've got it all wrong]

7. search engines and hypertext. Integral aspects of your transmedia strategy.

8. freebies and pay-per-engagement
The relationship between these is very important. Freebies have to be more significant than just marketing.

9. The community
Where does your audience go to become collaborators? Can you help establish that? Are you going to ‘police’ it?

Oct 162011
 

 

Shut up little man – an audio misadventure from Closer Productions on Vimeo.

A doco about a community. Community is anywhere, you just have to recognise it.

Aug 052010
 

Facebook has launched a new type of page called a ‘community page’::

We hope Community Pages and your improved profile make it easier for you to learn more about your friends and to express yourself….

Profiles no longer are a static list of likes and interests. Now, they are a living map of all the connections that matter to you.

I’m not sure that this is really about community. It’s about identity, masquerading as community. The collective nature of a community doesn’t have ‘you’ at its centre. It doesn’t exist to serve ‘you’. It is a collectivity of people with enough in common to allow negotiation of common outcomes to be attractive enough to overcome individual interests. I’m also a little suspicious of ‘communities’ that are jump-started in such an overtly manipulative way by some central power, although I’m prepared to concede that sometimes this might work.

The conflation of community and identity is going on a lot in the marketing of social media. Joining the ‘community’ bandwagon – and taking advantage of the under-defined but vaguely positive connotations of this term – makes social media seem more like a social movement, greater than the sum of its parts. Many of these connections are organised programmatically; others are chosen by individuals and in some way result in a hyperlink.

Social media and this example from Facebook in particular have been strongly influenced by Putnam’s vision of social capital, in which community is derived from the confluence of selfish interests. Community thus becomes a sort of accidental, but convenient, offshoot of meeting your own needs.

Sometimes social media does create a community, but it’s driven by people whose exploration and publication of their personal identity comes secondary to the interests of the group. This seems to be the case with the core group on wikipedia (see Clay Shirky’s book, Here comes everybody). I’m not sure Facebook can ever do that, Facebook’s purpose is almost antithetical to community.

 

Vivien has found a novel example of community formation for people wanting to have an affair called ashleymadison.com. A community of interest, clearly – one of the most successful types of community formed online, and another example of where community and morality don’t necessarily cohere.

 

Quoted by James:

…a community is not an entity that exists and then happens to communicate. Rather, communities are best understood as constituted in and through their changing patterns of communication. Indeed, today, as new technologies enable cheap and immediate forms of long-distance communication, the nuclear family is often strung out along the phone wires, and community is no longer necessarily founded on geographical continuity.

(Morley from “Communication.” New Keywords: A Revised Vocabulary of Culture and Society: Oxford: Blackwell, 2005 p50)

Understanding community via their mode of communication certainly changes the emphasis from traditional concepts of community. of course, we know that community is no longer dependent on geography, but here Morley seems to be diluting the concept almost to meaninglessness. ‘Community’ has always been a term that contains some implicit value statement. That value statement is wholly missed if you reduce it to a group’s means of communication.

That said, I should read the whole article!

 

n response to the article The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites, Aaron found this Gawker parody about the value of social media ‘friends’, and questions the value of social media as a way to accrue social capital.

Jun 132010
 

Fiona has found an article about online communities of practice by Jankowski that I’ll have to follow up:

‘community of practice’ refers to relations maintained by persons across time who are involved in a collective set of activities. The ‘academic community’ could be considered an illustration of such a community of practice. One of the important features of this form of community is that it provides the overall conditions and basis for interpreting and making sense of events and activities. Participants share a general understanding of their activities and of the meaning ascribed to them. Although the distinction between these terms are not always clear, they collectively suggest from a perspective where use of language is central. The linguistics perspective seems particularly appropriate for computer-mediated communication because of its focus on forms of language and discourse.

 

the aggressive rollerblading community goes for tight stretch jeans (see Nisa Halim’s doco), while the Melbourne Shufflers like it loose (see Mei’s doco). Seem to me, either way would work for either community, but they’ve got their look and they stick tightly to it, as both doco makers point out.

Both are great examples of what Anthony Cohen calls the Symbolic Construction of Community, which Nisa summarises:

Anthony Cohen states that the community is symbolically constructed, as a system of values, norms, and moral codes which provides a sense of identity within a bounded whole to its members. He states that community implies and creates a boundary between us and them by use of symbolism. There are many types of symbol which mark the boundaries of community – flags, badges, dances. Languages and so on. This is because symbols always carry a range of meaning whose differences can be glossed over.

Note to self: this book is on Google books

© 2012 geniwate.com Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Hit Counter provided by Seo Packages